Roger Federer had much more success on clay than Pete Sampras.
Who among us … No part of this site may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any way or by any means (including photocopying, recording or storing it in any medium by electronic means), without the written permission of ATP Tour, Inc.. ATP Premier Partner This week, we step away from football and towards tennis.
Federer, a French Open champion and four-time runner-up, would be favored on clay over Sampras, who reached the semis in Paris just once. Scores © Copyright 1994 - 2020 ATP Tour, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Overall he won nine clay court titles.Although clay is neither player’s favorite surface, the Swiss obviously feels more comfortable on it.In a clay court match between them we would see Federer playing mainly from the baseline, working the ball around and handling Sampras's pace.The American would not be able to serve and volley all the time, as he liked to do, but would try to get to the net on every opportunity he had.Federer probably would have had the edge on their clay encounters.Pete Sampras won seven Wimbledon titles, while Federer has won six. Federer was at the beginning of his career and would win his first major only two years later, while Sampras was in the later part of his career and would retire in the next year.Since Sampras and Federer are the latest names in the GOAT discussion list, fans and experts always imagine what their match-up would have been like, had they played against each other when both were in their prime.In order for this analysis to be fair, it would have to consider matches played on each of the three different surfaces of the Grand Slam events: clay, grass and hard.Roger Federer had much more success on clay than Pete Sampras.The highlights of the American’s clay court career were a title in Rome in 1994, and a semi-final appearance at the French Open in 1996. That confrontation was a memorable landmark of the game. Pete Sampras pocketed 14 Grand Slam tournaments during his time at the top and was deemed to be one of the greatest of all times. Outdoor Grass Rank
Tennis has a huge number of candidates who could be considered the greatest of all time.Bill Tilden, Jack Kramer, Roy Emerson, Pancho Gonzales, Rod Laver, Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe, Pete Sampras and Determining the GOAT seems to be an endless discussion and impossible to resolve, mainly due to the difficulty in comparing players from different eras.The sport has evolved and changed tremendously, it wouldn’t be accurate or fair to make assumptions on possible head-to-head battles between players whose careers took place decades apart from each other.Perhaps the vast majority of the people reading this article are fortunate enough to have seen both Pete Sampras and Roger Federer play, although never against each other in their prime.These two geniuses clashed only once, at the 2001 Wimbledon, when the Swiss prevailed in five sets in the round of 16.
(And Bjorn Borg vs. John McEnroe, before senior colleagues shout out recency bias). The highlights of the American’s clay court career were a title in Rome in 1994, and a … Rank Search Venue: Wimbledon. It was basically a collision between generations: old vs new, classic vs modern.. A legendary five-set match won by Roger Federer. Each player won the US Open five times.Overall the Swiss won 45 titles on this surface and Sampras won 36.Hard courts would definitely have hosted the closest and toughest matches between these players.Federer would play mainly from the baseline, although aggressively, with a few charges to the net, sometimes behind a first serve.Sampras would be aggressive as usual, serve and volley most of the time, sometimes coming behind the second serve as the element of surprise.It is easy to see the players evenly splitting their matches on hard courts, with intangibles determining the winner on every occasion and most of the encounters going the distance. Matchup: Pete Sampras versus Roger Federer.
As everyone might expect, Federer vs. Sampras would have featured great battles and it could have been perhaps the greatest rivalry of all time, had they belonged to the same generation.So the big question is: who would have had the edge on hard courts, which would have been the key to determining who the best player was? Case for Roger Federer: Ah, the good old greatest-of-all-time debate. Overall, Federer has 11 grass titles and Sampras had 10.Grass is both players’ favorite surface and they are very accomplished on it.In this match we would probably see Sampras being very aggressive, serving and volleying on every point, both first and second serves, and taking the net on every chance he had.Federer’s tactic would probably be to keep the American on the baseline as much as possible, get a large percentage of 1The aggressiveness of Sampras would eventually pay off and he would have come out ahead in their grass battles, especially if we assume that the matches would have been played on the grass of Sampras's era, which lead to faster games.Roger Federer has four Australian Open titles, while Sampras captured two down under.
Where football has Lionel Messi vs. Cristiano Ronaldo for its GOAT debate, tennis has Roger Federer vs. Rafael Nadal. Latest