The first is around … The first is around the definition of "good," the concept of quality. My friend and writing partner for our rock style licensing pieces actually dubbed our little accumulation of music “Factory Fromage,” because we pump it out like a factory pumps out cheese. “After awhile you realize that putting your actions where your mouth is makes you less likely to have to put your money where your mouth is.” Cheap, Fast or Good: Your Best Option So in closing, the “pick two” option is still in effect in most business decisions, so beware of companies who say they can meet all three standards. Known as the Having spent my entire professional life as a software engineer, architect, director or CTO in companies of various sizes, I have felt these pains directly in many ways. Develop something quickly and of high quality, but it will be very costly to do 2. In these cases, it was crazy long days of writing and he even brought in other “additional music” writers/friends to help out and finish the score because otherwise, it just couldn’t be finished in time. The triangle assumes that "fast" and "cheap" is an option, when in truth, delivering a project where the result is low quality is almost never an actual option. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Keeping teams small and limiting our investment in the MVP let us keep the project "cheap." If you can get those priorities in order and are honest about project limitations, that really […][…] Good, Fast, Cheap: You Can Only Pick Two!

He has a definite attachment to each. “Many great opportunities are not cheap; but some cheap opportunities are so great.” There are a lot of times, however, when I write “tension” type cues that I’m not into (think: reality show competition stressful moment with buildup to the elimination!). “It is very rare that cheap decisions will make great impact.” by Jennifer Kes Remington showing below […][…] is a great diagram out there. Print out this picture as a guide! But, if your audience is looking for a mid quality item with a fast turnaround and low prices and you have to ask yourself if it’s worth investing in this mindset and losing sight of your original goals and values.The unattainable triangle is unattainable for a reason.
He rejects as unworthy what is below standard and despises as luxurious what is above or outside of it. And one from a graphic designer. The frugalist takes a vital interest in his tools, in his land, and in the goods he produces. "We could have saved the Earth but we were too damned cheap." If it’s cheap and good, it won’t be fast.

It’s taking advantage of the musician to deliver all three. Dominated by activities, he thinks of capital as a means to an end.” HOWEVER, you should never (and never be asked to) deliver music that is ALL THREE. It really makes so much sense in any artistic field.In this picture, there are 3 descriptors for how clients can ask for music (this actually can apply to any art). Hold a dignity in your words and actions. In marketing and advertising, this is referred to as the “The triangle is a maxim that high-quality goods delivered quickly and efficiently to customers will always come at a higher price and vice versa.” That is the cold, hard definition of the unattainable triangle.In this awesome infographic from Under-Rated, they display the challenge of the triangle very well.The triangle is considered to be “unattainable” because any business that attains it would be inherently flawed. It’s the age old golden rule, you can either have it fast, cheap or good, but you can’t have it all. Think about what happens in the business world. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our These particular films needed something like 60 minutes of music written (with fixes), orchestrated and recorded all within a short time period in time for a proper movie release. Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window) This is a prime example of something asked of an artist to be good and cheap—it is not going to be finished fast. You can deliver music to a client that is really good. In practice, however, trading between constraints is not always possible. Develop something quickly and cheaply, but it will not be of high quality 3. Customers are trained to associated price with quality and that is the main reason why the unattainable triangle may always be unattainable. - Kurt Vonnegut “Never use the word “cheap”.

“thoughts are cheap and they don't hurt anybody” Until recently, I have always accepted this principle as a fact of life – like death and taxes, as they say. Choose two." “I do not understand why people will spend over $1,000 on a cell phone when the $50 models work well.” I was taught about this early on when I started working with my second composer boss. The repetitive iteration and meaningful measurements will guide us toward the goal of delivering a project that is "good.